I agree that printed arrangements with too many chordal variations -- such as added "2-5"s all over the place -- can obscure the basic structure of the song. That can needlessly restrain and inhibit a rhythm guitarist from being (knowledgeably) creative.
Personally, I don't really mind when commonly used substitutions, added 2-5s, etc. are included in a chart but I really do wish sometimes that they were in parentheses when they're not from the original arrangement to help avoid confusion...would help in jams because some players tend to have a clear preference for "traditional" vs. "modern" chord arrangements and I tend to ape what the players more familiar with the song are doing so there's a more homogenous sounding rhythm section but it's not always clear from the chart which chords are actually original vs. implied and vice versa
Comments
It was done by violinist Kit Eakle and he charged for copies originally.
Not sure what the situation is now.
Agreed. Don't know how I missed this the first time. Love the little historical notes and the lyrics. This was work well done.
I agree that printed arrangements with too many chordal variations -- such as added "2-5"s all over the place -- can obscure the basic structure of the song. That can needlessly restrain and inhibit a rhythm guitarist from being (knowledgeably) creative.
Personally, I don't really mind when commonly used substitutions, added 2-5s, etc. are included in a chart but I really do wish sometimes that they were in parentheses when they're not from the original arrangement to help avoid confusion...would help in jams because some players tend to have a clear preference for "traditional" vs. "modern" chord arrangements and I tend to ape what the players more familiar with the song are doing so there's a more homogenous sounding rhythm section but it's not always clear from the chart which chords are actually original vs. implied and vice versa