I asked Stephane Wrembel this question once and he told me, "when they break." I find they tend to lose their sound after 2 months as well as developing wear at the point where they hit the fret, especially on the G. Just curious how other people go about it.
Thanks
Comments
pas encore, j'erre toujours.
Ideally I would change them every 10 hours playing or so which thesse days is about a week and a half to two weeks. After about 10 hours I notice a difference in the tone. Not huge but noticable.
Some guitars like new strings, but I find nearly all vintage guitars sound way better, and frequently louder, with old, dead strings. I first noticed it on a Busato, when the volume dropped about in half when I changed strings the first time. I started calling everyone I knew trying to figure out what I'd done wrong. Then, as the strings started losing their newness, the volume and great tone came right back. At Django in June last year, we recreated the famous card game prelude to Django's "J'Attendrai" video. The next day, Craig Bumgarner was checking the specs on the Selmer, and changed strings, and the guitar sounded so terrible we couldn't complete the performance part of the video. The same strings are still on it, and they sound great now. I know this sounds counter-intuitive, but it's absolutely true, and true of every vintage guitar I own or have owned.
I am not joking when I say I change them about once a year, although I don't put near as many hours on them as Wrembel does on his. "When they break" seems like a good approach to me. I hate changing strings, because then I have to go through a period where the guitar sounds awful, making me not want to play it. But if I don't, they never wear in.
pas encore, j'erre toujours.
It was all for the good, though. Craig makes such bloody good guitars, that if by letting him study them, he can make even better ones, it's my duty to the world of gypsy jazz. It was just bad timing on my part. Proper single malts will do that to a man...