Hi there,
Have you used this system ? How is it ? Does it really sound as clear as a mic, but without the feedback ?
My Group is gigging more and more and I'm sick of being behind a bunch of mics, both for my vocals and for my guitar, so I need need a better system for my Selmac guitar to be amplified, and I PREFER natural sound, NOT the slightly driven pickup sound.
thanks,
Anthony
Comments
BTW, Kevin is trying the new Patrick Inghilleri mike system which Denis Chang demos in this video. To my ears, the sound is exceptionally accurate and acoustic. It is supposed to be highly feedback resistant. We did experience some problems with it in a recent gig, but that was probably due to weird speaker placement in this venue causing interaction with a vocal mike and in turn interacting with the guitar, not really something the pickup is designed to fight. The Leri Website has to be one of the worst ever, though, very hard to understand what you should be ordering, and Patrick's English is not so good - his responses to e-mails are in a sort of Franglish that can be hard to decipher.
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
I went to hear Jim's gig a couple of nights ago and the leader of that band uses a Barault guitar and an Ischell. I know the sound of his guitar well and I would say that the Ischell sounded as though you put your ear up to the guitar top while it was being played. Which isn't to say that it sounded like a guitar in the room. It sounded like a super hyper cardioid mic set "almost" directly on the top over a brace.
It sounded good, very good but its still a "type" of sound. It is a contact mic.
The clip of the Inghilleri sounds less midrange heavy but that could be DC's guitar in part, he's using an AJL.
The Barault is different.
But ?
My call the Ischell is good , some sense of compression in the midrange a flat high frequency response and a roll off on the lows.
The Inghilleri clip, and its just a clip, not something I heard live in the room sounds more open, with a much higher frequency reach, flatter mids and a low roll off. Less the contact vibe so less compression in the mid's . Which sounds more open, which is nice and a bit more microphone like, bearing in mind that in fact the ischell is a mic.
2 products with very different sonic fingerprints.
I suppose with the preamp thats offered with the Inghilleri you would have more control of the shaping than the Ischell which is sold with a buffer that has a couple of notch filters.
But my feeling about pickups and mic's is that if they need excessive treatment they aren't really much use live.
A preamp with a lot of bells and whistles is not my first choice for a gig.
The first iteration of the Inghilleri preamp was very complicated, it was said that that was a prototype and that the production model would be simplified, that would be good.
Guess the low roll on the Ischell may be a result of the rocker switch settings .
The Inglhlleri sounds more transparent which is a good thing for fidelity and is a good characteristic for a mic.
Still although the clip demonstrates transparency its not necessarily the "best" just the most transparent.
Unless transparency is your only criteria.
Way to go.
The website is definitely a little opaque and lean on detail, but the clips really do sound impressive, and I'm intrigued to say the least.
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
http://www.djangobooks.com/forum/discussion/13091/review-the-inghilleri-ing102-mic-pickup-system