DjangoBooks.com

string action - bridge modification needed?

T1mothyT1mothy ✭✭ Furch petite bouche
in Welcome Posts: 79
I assume I have something that could be considered as a high action. Its around 3,5 mm at the low E at 12 fret. Anyway I got used to the higher action and the tone boost was very much worth it. I had to tweak my bridge sort of to push the treble side towards the nut - shortening the scale. Im no engineer but am I right to say that I need the curve on the bridge to be more pronounced? It is just that Id like to get the manufacturer to make me a new bridge to get rid of the ice lolly shims so it perhaps might be good to point out to them to carve me a new one with the intonation and my string action in mind. Not exactly sure what to tell them. I know they should know better but who knows. I can imagine somebody hearing "make a taller bridge" and that would be it.
Any advice on how to specify my order will be greatly appreciated
Tim

Comments

  • The arc of the bridge should match the radius of the neck
    The Magic really starts to happen when you can play it with your eyes closed
  • JehuJehu New Zealand✭✭✭
    edited March 2015 Posts: 77
    I think he means the compensation, not the radius. If you're having to tilt one side of your bridge closer to the neck than the other side, then yep, you need more compensation carved into it. It's very hard to get a bridge to the appropriate height and compensation without the guitar in hand (due to neck angle, etc.), so I think if you want this done right you'd be better off taking it to a local luthier.
  • Jeff MooreJeff Moore Minneapolis✭✭✭✭ Lebreton 2
    Posts: 476
    Not sure what your asking. Your right that high action gets more sound.
    I'm not a luthier but have experimented with the arc on the tops of the bridge to maximize playability. I find that each string (starting low E to high E) needs progressively less height off the fret board. Low E needing the most. Without to much explanation, the top of my bridges is almost flat. The bridges that have come with the GJ guitars I play had more rounded tops. The fretboards on these guitars are typically 20" radius. But the bridges from the luthier tend to be something like a 26-29" radius, so "flatter" than the neck. I like a medium action and I find the less radius on the bridge works.
    The Low E is not just .5mm but like 1mm higher than the high E. So the bridge angles downward more than average with the higher side being the low E.
    Just my way of maximizing things, not necessarily correct or for everyone.
    "We need a radical redistribution of wealth and power" MLK
  • Both the bridges on mine are afai can tell the same radius as the neck. With a flatter radius the 1 and 6 strings will be further away from the fretboard than the 3 and 4 strings which I would find a bit odd.

    The Magic really starts to happen when you can play it with your eyes closed
Sign In or Register to comment.
Home  |  Forum  |  Blog  |  Contact  |  206-528-9873
The Premier Gypsy Jazz Marketplace
DjangoBooks.com
USD CAD GBP EUR AUD
USD CAD GBP EUR AUD
Banner Adverts
Sell Your Guitar
© 2024 DjangoBooks.com, all rights reserved worldwide.
Software: Kryptronic eCommerce, Copyright 1999-2024 Kryptronic, Inc. Exec Time: 0.005557 Seconds Memory Usage: 0.997665 Megabytes
Kryptronic