I assume I have something that could be considered as a high action. Its around 3,5 mm at the low E at 12 fret. Anyway I got used to the higher action and the tone boost was very much worth it. I had to tweak my bridge sort of to push the treble side towards the nut - shortening the scale. Im no engineer but am I right to say that I need the curve on the bridge to be more pronounced? It is just that Id like to get the manufacturer to make me a new bridge to get rid of the ice lolly shims so it perhaps might be good to point out to them to carve me a new one with the intonation and my string action in mind. Not exactly sure what to tell them. I know they should know better but who knows. I can imagine somebody hearing "make a taller bridge" and that would be it.
Any advice on how to specify my order will be greatly appreciated
Tim
Comments
I'm not a luthier but have experimented with the arc on the tops of the bridge to maximize playability. I find that each string (starting low E to high E) needs progressively less height off the fret board. Low E needing the most. Without to much explanation, the top of my bridges is almost flat. The bridges that have come with the GJ guitars I play had more rounded tops. The fretboards on these guitars are typically 20" radius. But the bridges from the luthier tend to be something like a 26-29" radius, so "flatter" than the neck. I like a medium action and I find the less radius on the bridge works.
The Low E is not just .5mm but like 1mm higher than the high E. So the bridge angles downward more than average with the higher side being the low E.
Just my way of maximizing things, not necessarily correct or for everyone.