I have noticed it doesn't take long for Stochelo to wear away the finish where his right hand hits the top of the guitar. My experience with old Martins has been that the ones with a little top wear have the most mojo!
Anyone here feel strongly about having a pickguard or not?
Comments
http://www.frets.com/FretsPages/Luthier/Technique/Guitar/Pickguards/ClearGuard/clearguard1.html
It is only visible if you look very closely and at a certain angle. The only downside (aside from lack of mojo) will be that in the long term, you may get different UV exposure under the pickguard than in adjacent areas. I'm not too concerned for mine, but if you have an expensive guitar that might be a consideration.
http://kling-on.com/
On the other hand, if I own a utility guitar that will be handed around at a session or loaned out , I always install a plate.
I use the LMI self adhesive plate which is around .017 thick and always used a mist of water to eliminate air bubbles. Thats a technique used by folks in the trades to install mylar window treatments .
You can't really see the plate.
The problem with plates isn't the UV changing the color of the surrounding wood. The difficulty is that peoples picking and pawing often exceeds the dimension of the plate. So you see this unscratched area surrounded by a scratched area, which looks knarley after a few years.
If you need a plate thats covering the whole top I guess I think your playing style is somewhat uncontrolled .