This is a question that probably well suits my handle.
To me the biggest difference in sound between Django and the rest is the effortless yet authoritative way he strung notes together. It seemed like no matter how fast he played, each note was well articulated. When the other players play fast you can tell that they're really trying hard for speed and don't manage to instill that necessary urgency into each note. When listening, the most appropriate metaphor for this phenomenon seems to be dancing -- Django's hand just danced up and down the fretboard.
I thought this image of dancing might be because Django only played with two fingers (two legs) -- John Jorgenson got some of same quality in his two-fingered mimicry of Django -- but then I heard Oscar Aleman and he has that same effortless yet dynamic style of stringing notes together.
My words naturally fail to describe what my ears hear. Can anyone understand what I'm getting at and if so, is there any objective technical explanation for why Django and Oscar have this quality in their playing?
Comments
The rest-stroke gives you drive and authority while still being relaxed and can bounce and "dance".
For me it is not so much this effortless in Django's playing that seperates him from the rest, it is his ideas, his utterly inventive ideas. Yes his timing, his tone, and very importantly his emotional intensity, remain unique, but his powers of improvisation will always be genius where others are only brilliant.
I think modern players play at much faster tempos than Django did. When he was playing jazz music was pop music, meant for dancing. Nowadays its all about being a virtuoso.
Django sounded relaxed because the tempos were more relaxed....
You need to listen to Django. The tempo had nothing to do with it. Listen to Mystery Pacific or Double Whisky or Daphne and many others. He played fast and some times really fast. But he still had melody. Not just fast runs and licks that he linked together. He never lost melody as his goal of soloing. Get past the recording and dig into what Django did and how he did it. Many of the new guys are really great and I like them. But I have yet to hear a modern player solo with note choice as the main importance over speed or technical ability as Django did.
Cheers,
Josh
Django's improv was idea-driven rather than technique-driven.
- Tom
1 Birelli = .85J
1 Stoch = .7J
1 Angelo = .42J
1 Tchavolo = .4J
1 Dorado = .35J
1 Django = .2J
1 Matelo = .1J
1 Birelli = .85J
1 Stoch = .7J
1 Angelo = .42J
1 Tchavolo = .4J
1 Dorado = .35J
1 Django = .2J
1 Matelo = .1J[/quote]
I think Dorado should be much higher on that list....have you heard this?
<**** valign="top">
Schmitt
Parisienne
</****>
<**** valign="top" width="5">
</****>
<**** valign="top" width="100">Parisienne"></****>
I completely agree... but I understand where he is coming from with the bad record quality argument. It's frustrating enough to try to play by ear, but trying to listen to each note through the poor record quality makes you crazy.
I would say that Joscho Stephan comes VERY close to djangos phrasing and note articulation. Perhaps that's just me though.
V