Hi everyone!
I've recently started playing gypsy jazz and have finally decided to buy a decent manouche guitar to further my growth. Excited! I've been following this forum for a while now, and have read wonderful reviews of the GJ-15 and the D-500. I was wondering, would either of these guitars be ideal for starters and, if so, which do you guys prefer? I'm aware of the price difference and that the D-500 has a bit of reverb, whilst gypsy jazz is typically meant to sound 'dry'.
Also, how do they compare with the Selma BM300? This is my only real-life reference to a gypsy jazz guitar, as it's not quite common both in clubs or in stores here in the Netherlands.
Thanks in advance, and am looking forward to starting this new adventure in my guitar playing!
Arifin
Comments
I wouldn't recommend one over the other. They're both good, and your right: The 500 is wetter but not so much and both will do the trick.
The neck on the 500 is a little wider and the finish is a lot nicer. The lack of a thick finish on the 15 means that the top is freer so the difference between the sound of each string is more pronounced.
I'm assuming you already know that these are short neck guitars so there's a little less room at the high end of the neck.
Both of these guitars represent a terrific value. Either gives you a powerful guitar that is capable of great variety of styles as they aren't as specifically "gypsy" as their long neck cousins. Both also have wider necks than the long cousins, something I prefer.
Recommend the GJ-15, a good choice for a first gypsy jazz guitar.
It's a superior instrument to the D-500 despite being at a lower price level, so that's a win-win.
Never heard of the other one you mentioned, so can't comment on that.
Thank you for taking your time in helping me out. I appreciate it. I've been thinking about my own style of play and would like to share the following thoughts.
I've been playing the guitar for about 15 years now and feel lucky to be able to come home and play my José Ramirez 4CWE, Martin HD-28e Retro, Fender American Deluxe Stratocaster and Rickenbacker 330/12 each day. All wonderful guitars. Having said that, I must say that I started with beginners' guitars and gradually 'went up the ladder' (for a lack of a better description). Now that gypsy jazz has sparked my interest, I wonder if a similar approach would be best when learning the genre. The idea of starting off with a decent manouche guitar for long-term playing also attracts me, and has, I think, my preference.
Also, of the guitars just mentioned, I feel most comfortable with the Martin and Fender, as their necks feel slim and offer easy access to the upper frets. If I'm correct, manouche guitars with an oval hole generally have a slimmer neck. Would it, therefore, be wise to stick to the necks I prefer and, thus, purchase such a guitar? I tend to think so.
Thanks in advance, and feel free to suggest guitars. I will look them up.
No, I don't agree. Gypsy guitars are worlds apart from all the others you mentioned. And since you've already been playing guitar 15 years, it's almost certain you're going to play a gypsy guitar with some weird technique at first, and not be able to get "the" sound right. That will be the limiting factor here, not the level of your instrument.
Learn to play the style of rhythm first, and learn the broken wrist picking style, because you won't even know what qualities you value most in a GJ guitar until you've been playing the music for a year or so.
From what you've said, you might prefer a GJ-10 to a GJ-15. It has a slimmer neck and better access (also a better sound) on the upper frets. Similar price.
I read an article about student gypsy jazz guitars on Reverb.com I think (which I can't find unfortunately), and the writer mentioned the following guitars: Gitane DG-255, Cigano GJ-10 and Paris Swing GG-39. The Gitane was described as 'darker sounding' than the Cigano. Not much was said about the GG-39. I'm currently in the process of recording an album and would like to add some gypsy jazz rhythm parts to the upright bass and vocals. The guitars just mentioned have oval holes and are preferred for lead; are these capable of handling rhythm parts as well or would the sonic space be too crowded with the addition of vocals?
On the other hand the GJ - 15 and Cigano have a 25 1/4" inch scale (slightly shorter than your martin, and all of the oval hole guitars are a whopping 26 3/8" scale length - longer than anything you have by an inch or more.
So with the ovals you get a slim - loooong neck with really good access to the top frets. You'll get used to it but it'll take a few hours or more.
Fancy lead playing, way up the neck, makes that long scale great because your fingers have room to romp and the long scale makes playing at the higher frets a easier.
I've got medium size hands, I'm 5'11", and no trouble, after a few years, making big stretches low down on the long neck, where its a "disadvantage".
Thank you for all the wonderful feedback. I'm back, and have tried out two different guitars at a mate. He has both a D-hole and an oval-shaped guitar, both pretty decent and in the €1500 price range used. (As a reminder, my preference goes to a guitar that's not per se world class but decent enough to record with, as my budget is around €500, which is slightly less in dollars.) I must say the feel is different, and I really prefer the thinner neck. However, when it comes to sound, the warmth of the D-hole is what I need.
Which D-hole guitars in the market have both a slim neck and a decent warm rhythmic sound?
Thanks in advance!