DjangoBooks.com
Welcome to our Community!
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Who's Online 0
Today's Birthdays
Software: Kryptronic eCommerce, Copyright 1999-2024 Kryptronic, Inc.
Exec Time: 0.030587 Seconds
Memory Usage: 1.130783 Megabytes
Comments
I think the Eddie Barclay comment was more in the context of general discussions about music. According to people who worked with him, his comments about music were for the main part limited to "This I like" or That is not very good". If anyone started talking about musical theory, he was not interested.
I don't think Django entered into any discussions about his arrangements with his musicians. He just told them what he wanted and because he was who he was, they accepted it. Coleridge Goode said in the London sessions, Django explained to Stephane Grappelli what he wanted, Grappelli translated it for them and that's essentially what they played.
Many others involved with him said pretty much the same thing. Charles Delaunay put it that Django's music was ".... a magnificent vision which he himself was the only one to experience...…"
youtube.com/user/TheTeddyDupont
What or how much Django knew about any of the standard "rules" of music is something we can't know. What we do know is that on the mythic mid-60s recording from La Lanterne, you can clearly hear Baro Ferret calling out the chord names during tunes. For what that's worth.
In my experience, if you are playing regularly with a musician who (for example) has an encyclopedic knowledge of chords, you will absorb some of this just by osmosis. And many of the people that Django played with over the years (Grapelly, Chaput, Rostaing, Levecque...) were skilled readers and knew theory. And it's true that the more you know about something the easier it is to learn more of that something. Django was a smart and intelligent man and when it came to this kind of thing, he probably learned just as much as he needed to learn.