I'm trying to adjust to having a tenth-fret dot on my Eastman DM-1. All my previous guitars have had the dot on the ninth fret. Looking at the book, The Story Of Selmer-Maccaferri Guutars, I see various early models with both ninth and tenth fret dots (not on the same guitar, or course!).
Does anyone have some historical background to this?
And what's your preference, and why?
Comments
http://www.djangobooks.com/forum/discussion/14500/
As for preference, I grew up playing guitars with a 9th fret marker, so I'm darn glad my Cigano has a 9th fret marker and not a 10th (I think that's common for "short scales?")
INterestingly enough, I've played classicals with no dots (or side markers) and really not had any problems...but I previously owned a Gitane with a 10th fret marker, and it drove me nuts, to the point of where I covered it with a piece of black electrical tape and painted over the side dot. I suppose if it's there, I'm inclined to use it...
Jeff - I suppose ninth would be my preference, but I had tenth on my banjo a few years ago, and got used to it. I once had a banjo that had a dot for EVERY fret! Now, that drove me nuts!
The two arguments I heard that made sense to me for both position is that on the 10 fret all the notes are naturals, no sharp/flat notes. But then on the 9 fret you have naturally occurring harmonics.
It's just a matter of habit. Similar to what Jeff mentioned, I once borrowed a friend's D hole guitar that had 9th fret marker and kept screwing up this head melody. Covered it with the black electrical tape and problem gone.
Actually weirder was when I got my Dupont, the previous owner had it custom built with a 9th fret dot. Took me longer to readjust playing GJ with 9th fret dot.
My short-scale, 12 fret-to-body DiMauro has the 10th fret dot.