I know this is a subject that has been touched on a number of times in these forums but I have never really read a definitive answer so I thought I'd start a new topic.
I recently bought a Stimer ST48 for my ALD D-hole, and while I love the sound I do find that the B-string is a little too "hot" for my liking. I am able to mitigate it a bit with my MXR 10 band EQ but still it's not ideal.
Am I right in thinking that it is fundamentally to do with the relative metals content of the strings I am using (bog standard Argentine 11s)?
If so, what would be a better set to use? What experiences have people had with Stimers and other brands of string? I would love to know if anyone has found a great combination.
Comments
Cheers,
Josh
Cheers,
Josh
The problem with Tomastiks 11's is that they have a plain 3rd. Selmacs do not intonate properly without a wound third.
Anybody know who makes roundwound 10's with a wound third in nickle?
Cheers,
Marc
www.hotclubpacific.com
As a thought... The unwound might not be that bad. It's impossible to set a guitar up for electric i.e. magnetic and acoustic and get the perfect tone in both worlds. At least that is what I have found. I am open to an unwound G if it gets me that much closer to the best of both worlds.
Cheers,
Josh
I think Josh hit on it: It's impossible to get the acoustic and electric worlds together happily. Its a compromise that may invovle carving the guitar body, carving another bridge for intonation, trying out lots of strings, and accepting a marginalized acoustic sound.
The allure of the multipurpose guitar is strong but the reality is a lot of compromise.
If you want to even out the magnetic response of the high strings, you should have thicker E (011), thinner B (013-014) and a nickel wound thin G (021) from a regular electric guitar string set.
But, as I stated in the beginning, I don't usually bother, because my Stimer playing occassions are just single gigs every now and then.
http://www.jazzpartout.com
Cheers,
Josh