Why aren't necks more integral to the body of a guitar? The accepted method of neck installation just seems to me to be an engineering fubar, introducing a pivot point and manifesting itself in humps at the neck/body join leading to fret buzz, etc. This also seems to be compounded by the practice of gluing the fretboard extension to the top.....which we all know is subject to the vagaries of the weather. The accepted practice of using shims to compensate for changes in the top, etc., only seems to introduce an added layer impeding the transfer of string vibration.
My knowledge of guitar construction is limited to be sure, but wood is wood and glue is glue, and I do know that these two items are not static by nature. Why not use some method of mechanical attachment? I know there are bolt on necks and that makes a lot of sense to me...at least more so than a dovetail joint. In archtop guitars the fingerboard extension is somewhat isolated from the top, and that seems to be a good thing.
I understand trying to keep to the original specs when duplicating a Selmer, but I can't help but think that for today's guitars, things could be done a bit more logically, eliminating the normal problems with necks.
Just thinkin' :-)
Why do they call it a rest stroke......I get tired every time I try playing like that.
Comments
Maybe other methods have been tried without the desired results in sound and projection, etc. I'm sure I don't know.
The whole set-neck system just seems so wrong to me, though. Oh well, guess I'll just keep filing and humidifying to keep the humps to a minimum.
Tom
Greg
Gotta say that I thought my initial post would spark some dialogue on this topic. I am truly interested in the whys and wherefores as to guitar construction. Would love to hear some builder's explanations and insights.
Tom
I think the spelling of the name referred above is Cumpiano if the reference is to the author/luthier
From his website:
http://www.cumpiano.com/Home/Articles/S ... block.html.
William R. Cumpiano replies: This is quite a testimonial given that the actual stress across the joint is applied along the pull of the strings. So if you do a vector diagram of the forces acting on the joint, you'll find that most of the stress is compression of the neck INTO the guitar, and only a minor portion is tension actually acting on the bolt and the wood surrounding the dowel. So it appears to be far stronger than it needs to be.
When one thinks of all the old Harmonys and Kays, etc. and their inevitable need for a neck reset, I am not completely convinced that the "tension" part of the equation is minor, but I do now feel better about the whole separate neck and body thing. Now about the gluing of the fretboard extension.........
Ken Bloom