Hmmmmm......if you're being sarcastic, the sig on the guitar is, of course, easily removed, if for some reason it bothers anyone....AND JJ's sig is also on the label, inside.
klaatuNova ScotiaProdigyRodrigo Shopis D'Artagnan, 1950s Jacques Castelluccia
Posts: 1,665
Hi Jim,
Nice looking guitar. It appears from the photo that the case is not a gypsy guitar case because of the foam padding in the bottom end. Would that be correct?
Benny
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
nope, i wasn't being sarcastic or anything. after seeing the photo of your guitar I just had the thought that I never seen guitars signed by admired guitarists on the inside label. they always sign the outside of the guitar , but especially on signature models, it would be cool to see a sig on the inside. thats all. i didn't mean anything other than that by my previous comment...
it would have 2 benefits:
1. the implied value of the signature would remain with the guitar
2. the writing on the outside of the guitar would have no detrimental effect on its value
i say this because their is no real value to the "visibility" of the signature being in plain sight.
Comments
Nice looking guitar. It appears from the photo that the case is not a gypsy guitar case because of the foam padding in the bottom end. Would that be correct?
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
it would have 2 benefits:
1. the implied value of the signature would remain with the guitar
2. the writing on the outside of the guitar would have no detrimental effect on its value
i say this because their is no real value to the "visibility" of the signature being in plain sight.