Hi there,
Over the past month I have been practicing long hours with the specific goal of being extremely proficient at basic arpeggio playing over as many songs changes as possible so they become second nature to my fingers.
Now, up until a few days ago, my primary focus has been basic major or minor arpeggios (no 7ths etc).
For the past few days, however, I've been trying to add dominant 7ths to the mix, which brings me to my question - how important is it to ferociously practice color notes in your basic straight forward arpeggio practice ?
I'm assuming VERY, as stephan wremble's book has an entire section showing you every arpeggio with colors that you can think of.
That said, I'm curious, specifically to those who have "broken through" in the style, how much time you've spent perfecting arps with color notes added, as opposed to simply working on phrases and licks over the mastered basic triad arps.
Thanks!
Anthony
Comments
That is not to say they cannot play arpeggios. If the arpeggio happens to be in a Django solo or some other lick you'll learn it automatically, but you know...in a musical way!
I find licks and phrases to be utterly useless if I don't know when or where to play them, which is shy I'm studying the arpeggios, so my fingers begin to unconsciously know where to go when following the changes of a song.
what other way is there ? Maybe it's because I wasn't trained to see the guitar like a collection of chord shapes, but rather a pentatonic scale and BAM !
I just personally don't see another way to really know where the shapes are and how to find them quickly.
Anthony
All transcriptions in the Rosenberg Academy are already broken down in licks. Stochelo also shows in the "improvisation" course how to practice improvising with the licks. This is exactly how he did things and many other top players as well.
If you listen to Diknu Schneeberger, Gismo Graf or Olli Sikkeli you think it is a coincidence they play many of Stochelo's licks?
I think it is in fact the best route for a music that is so specific in vocabulary as gypsy jazz. There is freedom, but only so many liberties can be taken before the playing sounds like it doesn't belong.
I play bebop too, and in that music vocabulary is key important but it is nowhere as stylistically restricted as gypsy jazz. That's a context where practicing arpeggios with extensions makes more sense.
But practicing arpeggios in gypsy jazz won't hurt you. It is excellent ear training and if done right and if you pay attention, a great way to learn to locate intervals and chord tones on the neck.
But if you are to consider your practice schedule, there is only so much time to spend in a day. You'd be better off learning solos and licks. When you know enough solos and licks, you can survive in a jam setting. That's step one. It will build a foundation for you to add to.
That's when developing your own style with theoretical constructs can be beneficial use of time. Because when you then learn an arpeggio, you can recognize it in what you can already play. Because you already know how to make music with it, it won't be a dry exercise to you but you'll actually KNOW what to do with the arpeggio.
I hope that makes sense
www.denischang.com
www.dc-musicschool.com
Many of us here have struggled learning licks and solos from recordings and then, when we went to play our own solo, found out that these didn't real get us anywhere. So therefore we tried to learn things in a more systematic, general way. Many of us have found books like "Gypsy Picking" and Daniel Givone's method very helpful... I'm sure Stochelo never once needed to look at books like that, but we did!
It's sort of like me: I learned to speak perfect English without ever studying methods with verb tenses, preposition usage or anything like that. But for me to learn French, far from France or Quebec, ooh la la...! I suddenly found out I needed all those books and methods!
**********
Having said that, the Rosenberg philosophy of using licks as a learning tool sounds very sensible to me... so, okay, Hemert, you got a sale! First thing when I get back home from Spain, I'm gonna sign up.
*************
Edgar Degas: "Only when he no longer knows what he is doing does the painter do good things.... To draw, you must close your eyes and sing."
Georges Braque: "In art there is only one thing that counts: the bit that can’t be explained."
I also find it amazing that after months of using a metronome the metronome gets more accurate although I think that where the strong beat is depends on where one is on the learning curve and what type of song one is playing.
... yeah, my metronome is way too #%^! accurate...
Edgar Degas: "Only when he no longer knows what he is doing does the painter do good things.... To draw, you must close your eyes and sing."
Georges Braque: "In art there is only one thing that counts: the bit that can’t be explained."
I use tempo on my iPad and find that I react faster to the visual than the sound.