Not sure if this discussion has already happened. Just wondering if anyone around here has had a chance to try both. What is the top arch like on these guitars? Thoughts?
I have already spoken here before about the aria that I have been working on, and for the moment it's ok. However, like a lot of people have suggested, it's missing something. It's a little "un-focused", if that makes sense, and you have to work a bit to get the 'gypsy sound'.
So, looking at switching it up in the future and probably unloading the Aria but I am still in a position where I cannot spend too much.
Comments
That said, I'm guessing most people on these boards (myself included) will tell you to stick with your Aria until you're ready to buy a luthier made GJ guitar. Work on your technique, listen to a lot of different guitars to see what it is you're looking for, put one in your sights and make it a goal to get one.
FWIW, at jams with my Dupont Nomade I regularly hear, "What kind of guitar is that? It sounds great." I paid less than $1500 slightly used. Michael sells them new for $2200.
I bought a Dupont MD-100 a couple of years ago and there is a world of difference. The Cigano and Dupont both have satin finishes, but the Dupont has a nice neck shape, great tone for rhythm and lead, and plays and looks like a piece of art.
The PS had a much better tone and finish, the neck was great and could sound really authentic if played right. Not a cannon but plenty loud for acoustic jammin.
As previously said, I'd recommend to just stick with the Aria until you can afford a Nomade or similar, I once personally witnessed Seb Giniaux make an Aria sound better than everyone else's expensive handmade guitars at a jam so I know it has the tone somewhere inside if you search for it...