Interesting experiment, but I suspect you can't use both the Schertler and the Schatten without a pre-amp (and some EQ). Direct in the PC they sound pretty crappy, that's for sure, but that's not the best sound you can get out of these things!
In this experiment, while the mics didn't sound great, they sounded better than schertler, schatten and stimer. Live, however, the mics just don't cut it. A lavalier mic that sounds good in a small cafe, sounds hollow and feeds back in a large venue (when being used for primary amplification and not monitoring).
Incidentally, the present results for the survey are:
Can anyone tell me if there are any major players that actually use lavalier mics for primary amplification? It seems like ever since the Bireli Vienne DVD came out, a lot of people went nuts for those, thinking that's how he got his sound, despite news to the contrary.
I recognize that phasey-sound from a gig somewhere; I remember thinking "this must be what seasickness feels like". I haven't heard that Romane/Stochelo disc, but I'll track it down. Thanks again.
The Schatten, while it sounded somewhat tele-like in the test, actually sounds very acoustic in live applications.
I agree completely. It sounds awful plugged right into the PC, but using the Schatten via a Baggs pre into my compact 60, I get a sound a sound which is very natural and acoustic.
As I mentioned in another thread, I think it sounds more natural than either of the bigtone-equipped guitars I've heard plugged directly into the compact 60, though it sounds a tad thin in comparison, so I'd actually give the edge to the bigtone.
Here's how they look from a energy/time perspective.
The Schatten is heavily EQ'd in the upper midrange - the mics show their expected EQ curves: vocal punch for the dynamic mic & sparkle for the lavalier mic. The Stimer is almost dead linear and slightly warmer than neutral - and the Schertler is very linear with a little topend sparkle.
Given this, my preference would be to run a Schertler & a lavalier in stereo which should give a good mix of acoustic cues & soundboard resonance and be linear enough to EQ as needed for any specific environment.
You get one chance to enjoy this day, but if you're doing it right, that's enough.
Comments
Learn how to play Gypsy guitar:
http://alexsimonmusic.com/learn-gypsy-jazz-guitar/
http://www.fingerpick.com/pickups.htm
Can anyone tell me if there are any major players that actually use lavalier mics for primary amplification? It seems like ever since the Bireli Vienne DVD came out, a lot of people went nuts for those, thinking that's how he got his sound, despite news to the contrary.
Thanks,
Jack.
I recognize that phasey-sound from a gig somewhere; I remember thinking "this must be what seasickness feels like". I haven't heard that Romane/Stochelo disc, but I'll track it down. Thanks again.
Best,
Jack.
I agree completely. It sounds awful plugged right into the PC, but using the Schatten via a Baggs pre into my compact 60, I get a sound a sound which is very natural and acoustic.
As I mentioned in another thread, I think it sounds more natural than either of the bigtone-equipped guitars I've heard plugged directly into the compact 60, though it sounds a tad thin in comparison, so I'd actually give the edge to the bigtone.
The Schatten is heavily EQ'd in the upper midrange - the mics show their expected EQ curves: vocal punch for the dynamic mic & sparkle for the lavalier mic. The Stimer is almost dead linear and slightly warmer than neutral - and the Schertler is very linear with a little topend sparkle.
Given this, my preference would be to run a Schertler & a lavalier in stereo which should give a good mix of acoustic cues & soundboard resonance and be linear enough to EQ as needed for any specific environment.