Holy frijoles...if we want to get it done, we just need to decide on the symbols. If the goal is to emulate the Real Books, maybe we should simply model our nomenclature on that...
That said, I think it was laid out pretty well with these:
Major: chord name w/6 if applicable. 6/9 seems to me to be too much-half the time I see it I just play a 6 anyway.
Major 7: maj7
Minor: m (also m6, m7, etc)
Dominant: 7
Dim: dim
"Half-dim": m7b5
Augmented: +
I'm actually fine with the circle, slashed circle, and triangle, but understand why people wouldn't want them. They do come in handy though when you're pressed for space, and the Minor(maj7) chord notated with a triangle is something we haven't discussed, I think. The usual descending line, for instance: Would we just write
Also it would be nice to use eight lines (systems) with four measure each and keep the A and B section in separate lines as a rule, it's so much easier to read that way.
At least for regular forms.
When there are extra unused lines those can be used to write little notes, an ending or maybe even a little lick.
Would it be totally unacceptable if I used Sibelius? Im really comfortable with it and don't have Finale.
Jack, I realize this is getting old, but might Gm(+7) be an alternative to the more cumbersome Gm(Maj7) only when space is really tight? Since we'll be using a plus as you suggest for augmented chords.
klaatuNova ScotiaProdigyRodrigo Shopis D'Artagnan, 1950s Jacques Castelluccia
Posts: 1,665
That progression is often written as:
Gm Gb+ Gm7 Gm6
or, for the benefit of the bass player
Gm Gb+ Gm7/F Gm6/E
Benny
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
I've never seen that and think it would be a bad idea for us to use it, especially since the G natural is often still played in one of the other voices...I have seen:
Gm Gm/Gb Gm/F Gm/E
Note what chord symbol this guy puts for the minor sharp-7th chord, i.e., minor with the major 7th (scroll down). He also uses no caps except for the key so the read is immediate.
Comments
That said, I think it was laid out pretty well with these:
Major: chord name w/6 if applicable. 6/9 seems to me to be too much-half the time I see it I just play a 6 anyway.
Major 7: maj7
Minor: m (also m6, m7, etc)
Dominant: 7
Dim: dim
"Half-dim": m7b5
Augmented: +
I'm actually fine with the circle, slashed circle, and triangle, but understand why people wouldn't want them. They do come in handy though when you're pressed for space, and the Minor(maj7) chord notated with a triangle is something we haven't discussed, I think. The usual descending line, for instance: Would we just write
Gm Gm(maj7) | Gm7 Gm6|
Actually, that looks fine.
best,
Jack.
We were getting way off topic (let's agree to disagree)...
Jack's summary of the symbols is good for me.
Are we gonna use slash chords?
At least for regular forms.
When there are extra unused lines those can be used to write little notes, an ending or maybe even a little lick.
Would it be totally unacceptable if I used Sibelius? Im really comfortable with it and don't have Finale.
I imagine we will...some songs (e.g. Djangology) really call out for them.
best,
Jack.
Gm Gb+ Gm7 Gm6
or, for the benefit of the bass player
Gm Gb+ Gm7/F Gm6/E
"It's a great feeling to be dealing with material which is better than yourself, that you know you can never live up to."
-- Orson Welles
really? thats the first time I have heard a "voice lead" written like that... how is a Gb augmented the same as a GmM7?
i don't know a lot about theory, so I am wondering what I am missing here?
Gm Gm/Gb Gm/F Gm/E
which I'd be fine with too.
best,
Jack.
http://users.chariot.net.au/~gmarts/chords2.htm